Reichstag Fire The Reichstag Fire 1. Source A was written by Rudolf Diels, who was the head of the Prussian political police at the m of the fire. In his account of events, he explains that he caught Van Der Lubbe ablaze(p) handed, the suspect was alone and there was no evidence that he could see that involved other people, even other communistics. He strongly disagreed with gore and Hitler’s theory that Van Der Lubbe was countenance in some way, and that the whole affair was a communist plot to seize power.
During the trial of Van Der Lubbe in 1933, he openly confessed to se tting fire to the building, but denied that he had been helped. His spread over in source B shows that he was adamant that he had worked alone. This would seem to prove Diels’ theory, however, Van Der Lubbe could easily have been evasiveness in rear to protect the other arsonists, who would have probably been high ranking members of the communist party according to thrust’s theory, and therefo...If you want to get a full essay, localize it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper