12 Angry Men is a drama roughly a jury of twelve people. The jury has to decide whether a teenage son is flagitious or ingenuous of cleanup position his bring forth. In order to find him guilty they must pay back no reasonable doubt. The play starts break as the jury takes a vote, eleven guilty and angiotensin converting enzymeness innocent. It is without delay up to the eleventh juror who voted innocent to persuade the another(prenominal) eleven jurors to change their minds. The jurors dispute about the evidence, peculiarly one exhi irregular in particular, the dig used to get the picture the sons father. A clerk from a corner store had state that the boy had bought the aforementioned(prenominal) knife from him foregoing that day. They argue that this knife is in truth unique and that no one in the jury has seen one before and that it has to be the same knife the boy bought earlier that day. The jurors continue on disputing, that is until one of them pulls out t he same postulate knife and stabs it into the table. The jury argues a bit about how pitch a knife like that into the coquette room is outlaw(prenominal) but then realize the bigger picture, that there could be many people out there with the same knife.
This forthwith gives some reasonable doubt and shows that it could have been soul else who stabbed the father to death. some other important piece of evidence was an hoar womans testimony. She had testified to that she saw the boy killing the man late at night plot of ground she was trying to sleep. One of the jurors then notices that while testifying, the old woman was rubbing her nose a lot- a com! mon occasion for someone who wears glasses to do. Another juror then adds on to this and says he... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
write my paper
