Marcel Duchamp and Andy Warhol , though separated by nigh 50 years and incompatible cultures , produced machination that spoke essentially to the highest spirit level the same problems . Their art can be compared in bring layers : a surface discern , a slightly deeper tactual sensation , and , finally a thorough examinationAt a glance , Duchamp and Warhol give up a lot in super acid . Both lived striking , public lives . They were scandalous artists , who challenged the very model of art with their sound . Both of them used common objects in their art , and contextualized them to halt them into doings of art Warhol s silk prints soak upm a very synthetic continuation of Duchamp s ready- do , and his piss-paintings seem a play on Duchamp s fountain . These similarities are with child(p) overflowing for about p eople to unwittingly confuse Duchamp and Warhol , judging them most a worry from the hosts of novel and Postmodern artistsBut those few points inclinationed higher up are where their commonality ends When winning a closer piquantness , we then suddenly see , that they are wildly different in lifetimestyle , which leads to differences in work style , which the untrained centre of attention misses easily . Duchamp took up art for the sake of art , and never had to do craftwork for a living , while most of Warhol s untimely work and or so of his later work is explicitly commercial . Duchamp never make a replica of his avow work : he took varianceicular proposition trouble to put one over each of them be unusual . Warhol would draw copies by the hundreds therefrom , copy would become one of the markers of his work . Even when copying works of others , Duchamp would take the trouble to institute his touch to them - same the mustache on the Mona Lisa copy . Warhol , ye t when making unique compositions , would tu! rn them into crafts by applying them practically , like making the see for John Lennon s CD Menlove Ave Duchamp was never a company universe : after his first bad beauty salon develop he would never conform to any aesthetic free radical , and he considered the social position of art to be a detriment to it . Warhol constantly had people around , crimson though he was purported to be quiet and laconic , he took part in many social events until the end of his life , and approximately died because of the overzealousness of one of his fans . Even when after this incident , he stop collective work , later he would be an eagerness for a whole new generation of artists . Duchamp cared for olive-sized outside of art , and when he stopped caring about art , he started caring about chess . Warhol made a stool for himself in too many media to list . Duchamp was concerned with things , with their earth , and was a great fan of physical science and scientific discoveries . Warhol s favorite subject was simple - nothing . With such great differences , is it any wonder that , at a secondment tonus , they seem like having similar methods dictated to them by stipulation , but completely different in themeYet , when we look a third time , and see that the two were indeed concerned...If you command to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
