Community Corrections Essay

Introduction1. department of department of corrections and the tools used to avenge and rehabilitate offenders.2. record conjunction department of corrections.3. Introduce Thesis- A confederation corrections sentencing strategy applies a represent of mean(a) punishments and would best suitable the involve of the penal strategy, convicted offenders, and the familiarity by lower be and prison house overcrowding, while retentivity median(a) crime offenders out of chinks and prisons. be Paragraphs1. How company department of corrections provides alternatives to imprisonment. 2. How Community corrections is designed to consider twain the galosh of local residents as head as the treatment and rehabilitation ineluctably of the offender. 3. How Community department of corrections reduces prison overcrowding.4. How Community Corrections eitherows judges a more(prenominal) than receive sentencing clay that offers an selection of liaise sanctions including fi nes, community service, electronic monitoring, house arrest, intensifier probation and mission packs.Conclusion How a Community Corrections sentencing strategy is military forceive in its power to help rehabilitate offenders and keep prisons clear of intermediate offenders.Reference pageAPA formatted point of reference page.Using community corrections to better meet the needs of the penal organization, convicted offenders, and the community.The join States correctional system serves two principal(prenominal) specific functions in relation to sinful offenders. The correctional system serves as a tool for punishing offenders and forcing the offender to comprise for their crimes, it also serves as a means for rehabilitating offenders and preparing them for successful re intro into society. The correctional system at present uses probation, parole, imprisonment, and the death penalty to both(prenominal) punish and rehabilitate offenders. A community corrections sentencing strategy applies a range of intermediate punishments and would better meet the needs of the penal system, convicted offenders, and the community by keeping intermediate crime offenders out of jails and prisons.Community corrections describes programs that provide alternatives to the imprisonment of offenders in jails or prisons. These programs include activities located in the selfsame(prenominal) argonas in which offenders live and work. Community corrections options atomic number 18 designed to consider both the condom of local residents as well as the treatment and rehabilitation needs of the offender. According to (Morris & angstrom unit Tonry, 1990), a more comprehensive sentencing strategy that relies on a range of intermediate punishments including fines, community service, intensive probation, and electronic monitoring would better meet the needs of the penal system, convicted offenders, and the community.Community corrections can be very beneficial to the individuals wh o are placed on probation in a sense that it gives them a endorsement chance to redeem their wrongs in society. (Foster, Burk, 2006). Community corrections vary from urban center to city and assert to state, and were originally decentralized infra the control of local courts. (Foster, Burk, 2006). Currently, community ground alternatives to prison are either state run programs, or county run programs subsidised by the state. Community corrections need society in a return of confident(p) and negative ways. The positive substance is that probation cuts down on prison and jail bes, and can save hundreds of thousands of tax payer dollars that it would cost to feed and house offenders if they were sentenced to prison or jail. A negative effect on society is that you honestly can non acquire whether, the probationer or parolee pass on abide by the terms of release. nigh prisons are experiencing overcrowding. Several states in the sec were ordered by federal order to either r elieve the overcrowding of the prison system or adapt to other forms of corrections (Petersillia, 1998). This created the concept of intermediate sanctions. medium sanctions are the end result of the idea that imprisonment and probation are both used excessively. (Morris and Tonry, 1990). It was argued that intermediate sanctions could relieve overcrowding, enhance public safety and rehabilitate offenders while producing cost manner of speaking to the jurisdictions that imposed them (Petersillia, 1998). (Morris and Tonry, 1990) argued that imprisonment and probation are both used exceptionally, with a near nullity of useful alternatives in between.They argued that judges should be allowed a more graduated sentencing system that offers an selection of intermediate sanctions including fines, community service, electronic monitoring, house arrest, intensive probation and boot c deoxyadenosine monophosphates. This, they felt, was crucial as different punishments are viewed different ly by various criminals. lift camp prisons were designed to relieve the overcrowded prison system by reducing the financial costs to the state with the secondary goal of rehabilitating offenders (Mackenzie and Shaw, 1990). (Mackenzie and Shaw, 1990) gear up the majority of boot camp participants showed stronger positive feelings about their prison experience and were more motivated about the possibility of private change rather than those who served their sentence in traditional prisons.(Hermes, 2008) stated, From 1987 to 2007, the amount that states spent on corrections growingd 127 percent, more than half dozen times the 21 percent increase that states directed to higher(prenominal) education over the same period, according to the report. The report write from the church bench sharpen stated that, the Pew Center on the States also shows that increases in states corrections budgets are far colossal those for higher education.(Hermes, 2008). The report from the Pew Center al so showed that Connecticut, Delaware, Michigan, Oregon, and Vermont spend more on corrections than on higher education.Corrections expenses are higher than ever and are on the rise. If the corrections system does not change it will continue to cost states more and more every year. patronage these prisons this way takes money away from higher learning universities and colleges and the students of our future, the time for change is now. A community corrections sentencing strategy is stiff in its ability to help rehabilitate offenders, keep prisons clear of intermediate offenders, all while serving the community by lowering costs of prisons and leaving style for the most violent offenders out in the community.Reference PageCommunity Corrections. (2002). In World of Criminal Justice, Gale. Retrieved from http//lib.kaplan.edu/login?url=/login?qurl=http//www.credoreference.com.lib.kaplan.edu/entry/worldcrims/community_corrections.Deschenes, E. & Petersilia J. (1994) . What punishes? Inmates rank the severity of prison vs. intermediate sanctions. Federal Probation, Vol. 58 Page 3Gale. (2008). Wests cyclopaedia of American Law, Edition 2.capital punishmentHermes, J. J. (2008). 5 States Spend More on Prisons Than on Colleges. Chronicle Of Higher Education, 54(27), A17.Mackenzie, D. & Shaw J. (1990). Inmate Adjustment and Change during lash Incarceration The Impact of punitive Boot Camp Programs Justice Quarterly, Vol.7 1125-150Morris, N., & Tonry, M. (1990). Between prison and probation Intermediate punishments in a rational sentencing system. New York Oxford University Press.Pearson Education, Inc. (1995-2010). Sentencing and the Correctional System Summary, Chapter 11.Petersilia, J. (1998). A Decade of Experimenting with Intermediate Sanctions What Have We Learned Federal Probation. 627-20.Schwarzenegger, A. Governor (2010).http//www.kpbs.org/news/2010/jan/08/overcrowded-and-expensive-governor-addresses-calif