Rubin? Yes! Yes! Yes! Essay -- Essays Papers

The vulgar and refreshing paraphrase of a simplified hippy magnetic declination of what shall be taken as topic We atomic number 18 so oppressed. perchance we are not repressed, but come on. We are so oppressed. Malcolm X knew it, Catharine MacKinnon knew it. E reallyone knows it. One way we are oppressed is tripually. We might not equitable be repressed, go we still clearly are because there are laws and things. But, come on. Even if knowledgeableity is socially constructed, its still truly material, it is out there as much as anything - words are actions too. Gayle Rubins Thinking Sex considers the political history of sex regulation, its modern form, and a bit of theory most sexuality and its discourses. At the very apex of the flow of the article towards freedom in sexual practice, she draws the broth at consent, straining out bad sex from good sex on the line in the sand of what is agreed to and what is not. Rubins rear fails to take seriously the Histor y of Sexuality that she relies on for her rejection of political regulations about sexuality, and thus ends up advocating the consent limitation that recapitulates all the problems and fancies she finds in sexual legislation.Rubin bemoans the oppressive laws that tell people what sexual practices are to be sure and unaccepted, as if laws were to be obeyed - a presumption that already constitutes a particular(prenominal) type of subject in relation to a kind of occasion (the power of/in Law). Because we are so oppressed, unable to choose amongst sexual practices, we should give up these overrated relics of good sexuality and bad. Instead permit everyone do anything, so long as they practice the vaunted ritual of consent. And while consent may be hard to locate, and does have problems, it should still b... ...it in the settled form Rubins partial agenda of consent relies on for its humanist restraints, as if recapitulating prevalent representations of the control of nuclear weapons - on a hair trigger, under control, in return assured, and yet therefore also for these assurances mutually constitutive on the other side of the trigger and self-deploying in their fluxes of power and selves. Sexuality can be much more exciting for bodies and pleasures (Foucault 157) than this half-hearted causa lets itself argue. Why respond to a demand for bread with the offer to let them eat consent?WORKS CITEDFoucault, Michel. The History of Sexuality Volume One. time of origin Books New York, 1978.Rubin, Gayle. Thinking Sex Notes for a Radical Theory of the governing of Sexuality. in Pleasure and Danger Exploring Female Sexuality. ed. Vance, Carole. Pandora London, 1992.