Monday, March 4, 2019
Nationalism After the War of 1812 Essay
After the warfare of 1812, a surge of nationalism spread e very(prenominal)where throughout America. Having unofficially won the war without crimson an official army, the people of America became very proud of themselves and how their extensive domain established such a feat. The nationalism grew until John marshal, an aggressive school principal Justice, further reinforced and expanded it. He was a devout Federalist appointed by John Adams years before his most famous reason of Marbury vs. capital of Wisconsin in 1803. Being a Federalist he was a great rival to Thomas Jefferson. He served until 1835 and was the forth Supreme appeal Justice.His plainly legal schooling was six weeks attending lectures at the College of William and Mary, however when he took the bench in 1801, he changed the Judicial Branch as we last it. In fact, he made the branch the most powerful branch of the government at that time.Read more How do checks and balances guard against dictatorship essay His most significant early case was the famous Marbury v. Madison in 1803, which established the right of the court to declare the actions of local, state or federal governments invalid if they violate the Constitution. This process of declaring actions void was called Judicial brushup and it made the butterfly equally as powerful as the legislative and executive branches of government.Another important case was Martin vs. Hunters Lessee in 1816. The ruling by Marshall declared that the power of the Supreme romance extended to the State Courts. The court now had the right to directly refresh other courts decisions. Yet another case, Cohens vs. Virginia strengthened this right and extended the go on of the court all the way to the citizens of the U.S. and states. Marshalls court became more and more powerful until it got the right to review almost all get court decisions.The famous Fletcher vs. Peck case ruled (in 1810) that the Supreme Court had the right to void State laws. T he details behind the case were as follows The Georgia legislature had issued extensive land grants in a disseminate with the Yazoo Land Company. It seemed suspicious so the company was taken to court. A succeeding legislative session repealed the grants because of thecorruption that had accompanied the original grant. The Supreme Court, with Marshall presiding, decided that the original action by the Georgia Assembly had conventional a valid contract, which could not be broken regardless of the corruption. This was the very first time that a State law was voided because it went against the Constitution.Then, after the war of 1812 Marshall issued more decisions that strengthened the federal government and Federalist ideas. In the McCulloch vs. medico case, Marshall ruled that the state did not have the right to value or regulate banks. This similarly encouraged economic expansion and development. In the Dartmouth vs. Woodward case it was declared that the states had no right to alter or scotch contracts unilaterally. It also promoted business development.The last important case was Gibbons vs. Ogden, which further strengthened federal power by ruling that the Constitution had specifically accustomed Congress the power to regulate commerce.Under John Marshall, the Supreme Court gained enough power to surpass the power of the other branches of the government. He also declared many laws and rulings that America still follows and lives under even today. all way, he changed the Judicial branch forever, especially at that time and the earthly concern has never seen a more intelligent man presiding.