Dangerous Climate Change. What Strategies Are Available To Avert The Essay

stark modality Change. What Strategies Are Available To Avert The Onset Of Dangerous Climate Change - Essay ExampleSome reports have shown European summers getting hotter, Alaskan streams and separate lakes getting warmer, and our polar ice caps allegedly thawing (Schneider and Lane, 2006). More than just the actual warming of the artificial satellite, the regard of such warming has certainly captured the worlds attention. These are the major issues which have caused much bushel among authorities and the public in general. This issue has managed to affect the environmental, as well as the business lodge with projected losses in profits accredited to mode variety. Environmental experts claim that as our planet continues to grow warmer, more environmentally related disasters would be expected to occur with much stronger hurricanes, storms, and typhoons building up in the warmer oceans (Lemonic, 2008). These experts further emphasize that man has to address the issues which pe rtain to modality change in order to stem the progression of this phenomenon into redoubted levels. The word dangerous seems to have now been strongly associated with humour change. Its actual meaning in the context of modality change will be discussed in this stem. This paper shall discuss climate change and the divergent ways by which its implications can actually be quantified to dangerous levels. It will discuss the delegate where climate change can be considered acceptable and the point where it is considered to be dangerous. This study is being undertaken in order to establish a thorough and comprehensive understanding of climate change as well as its implications to our society and our efforts towards reversing its impact. Discussion Defining dangerous climate change Dangerous climate change is a term which was introduced legally during the 1992 UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (McGuire, n.d). Climate researchers have do up with different definitions in order to define the point at which climate change can be considered dangerous. Schneider and Lane (2006, as cited by Spratt and Sutton, 2008) have suggested different metrics in measuring climate change and such metrics have included the risks to unique(p) and threatened geophysical or biophysical systems risks related with extreme weather events total damages temperature thresholds to large-scale events risks to globular ecosystems loss of human cultures key sustainability metrics of water, energy, agriculture, health, and biodiversity the number of people put at risk and the triggering of irreversible chain of events. These are all metrics which can be used in order to gear up how dangerous the impact of climate change is. Dawson and Spannagle (2009) discuss that dangerous climate change is the degree of climate change which violates Article 2 of the UNFCCC. Article 2 basically sets forth that the function of the UNFCCC is to manage the spark of greenhouse gases to levels which would prevent dangerous anthropogenic preventative with the weather and climate system (Dawson and Spannagle, 2009). In effect, such acceptable levels must be achieved within levels which would allow ecosystems to adapt naturally to climate change go out that food production is not threatened and enable economic development to proceed in a sustainable manner (Dawson and Spannagle, 2009, p. 112). Article 2 does not use the exact words dangerous climate change, however such words are accepted in terms of dangerous anthropogenic interference it also refers to the man-made toxic chemical emissions which trigger climate changes beyond their natural patterns. The UNFCCC has not come up with a clear definition